"Uno
di voi, un tedesco in Florence" Jemima
Montagu In
1976 a young German set out for Florence hoping to become an actor. In fact he
started making paintings, but he did not leave the world of theatre behind. Instead
Martin Kippenberger absorbed theatre and the theatrical into his diverse working
practice as an artist and, above all, he became the protagonist, and often performer,
in all his work. Nearly
thirty years later, Markus Vater, another young German, also went to Florence.
His work bears certain similarities with his predecessor - the former "tedesco
in Florence" - which is why the parallel is relevant. Vaters practice, like
Kippenbergers, is extraordinarily diverse. His roots lie in painting - the result
of many years of study in the painting department at the Duesseldorf Academy -
and he freely experiments with a range of images and visual codes, from representational
portraiture to kitsch airbrushed poster, and from newspaper photo-story to cartoons
and illegible doodles. However Vater also makes objects, sculptures, computer
animations, drawings and writings. When I say he "makes writings", its
because, like the statements of Fluxus artist Ben Vautier or even the subversive
doodles of Raymond Pettibon, writing is so integrated in Vaters work that it seems
to take on concrete form. It is also crucial to the spirit or soul of his work.
Pithy, aphoristic
statements, often accompanied by doodle-style illustrations, can be found across
Vaters practice. They appear, suddenly, in the midst of a sculptural installation
or embedded in a grid of paintings. Or else he covers an entire wall with these
scribbles and drawings, creating a visual overload of images and ideas. These
statements seem to be the essence of Vaters work because they act as agents of
change or transformation which suddenly throw everything off-balance. They challenge
and provoke, they inspire and amuse, and above all, they jolt the lazy viewer
into thinking harder about the images in front of him. | | why
is the world dominated by countries with changing seasons?
|
Architecture
of Evil (2003) is an installation made during Vaters stay in Italy, which
comprises a vast canvas drawing of Roger Daltry, lead singer of The Who,
and a simple triangular structure made from pink paper with five short texts written
on it. Vater has described Daltry in the drawing as "happy and at ease, human,
there, upbeat"; its true - he is smiling and must be at the pinnacle of his
career. But the texts, in sharp contrast, work against this mood of lightness,
each exploring the idea of evil through bizarre musings and strange pseudo-scientific
propositions. One text states: "Evil doesn't exist. There are only particles
circling around other particles. There are arrows pointing in directions and particles
which move through space in waves. Mankind is a temporary unstable construction.
My mother is just an experiment which could burst any minute like a soap bubble.
LetŐs be honest: we have absolutely no sense of time." If Daltry is all
light, clarity and airiness, then these texts seem to present the dark side, a
muddle of negative thoughts and nihilistic cul-de-sacs. | | Architecture
of evil
|
The
investigation of opposites appears to be a common thread in Vaters work. He has
explained how he is interested in exploring the relative values of common binary
structures such as good / bad, light / dark, inside / outside, etc. as a way of
challenging traditional ways of looking at the world. It is not surprising that
he often chooses to use comedy to subvert these values, and by playing the fool
can also reveal the insight of the idiot-savant. In Model of God, 2003,
Vater has placed a postcard, with stuck-on legs, on top of a small rock made out
of papier-maché. The postcard shows a truck tipping cement off a quay into
the sea, and the caption above the image reads; "he wants to make a model
of god by filling the ocean with concrete". In this modest work Vater takes
us from the heights of celestial fantasy, idealism and hope to the lows of a dried-up
sea-bed full of concrete, from which this ugly papier-maché rock might
have tumbled. It could be read as a critique of western capitalism's devastation
of the planet, and the slow encroachment of concrete across the globe, but it
remains more open-ended and less judgmental. Vater opens up ideas, and then leaves
them floating as a series of alternative possibilities, a kind of fantasy parallel
universe. | | outside/
Model of God
|
Vaters
bizarre philosophical theories and strange, hand-made objects place him firmly
in the anarchic tradition of dada and Surrealism. But his tendency towards the
role of mad scientist may be more closely linked to Swiss artists Fischli and
Weiss, whose work also pursues the cross-overs between scientific knowledge and
everyday life. Their first film Der geringste Widerstand (1980), which
tells the story of a bear and a rat who set off to conquer the world and plumb
the depths of science, could easily appear as a scenario in one of Vaters cartoons.
Likewise their famous sequence of household chain-reactions in Der Lauf der
Dinge (1987) shares the same spirit of improvised confusion as many of Vaters
drawings and aphorisms, such as a touching painting of trees bending back down
to earth with the caption: "Trees that couldn't make up their minds".
| | Bäume
|
But,
as with the best humour, Vaters jokes and visual puns also express a serious side,
exposing a genuine curiosity and concern about what is happening in the world.
Through low-tech measures and materials, he reaches towards big issues and ideas,
and isn't afraid of turning things upside down to see what lies underneath. Vater
recently developed a theory about the relationship between the seasons and global
power, exploring an observation that it is only powerful, western countries that
have such marked changes of seasons. Moon, 2003, and Garden, 2003, which were
both painted in Italy, explore related ideas; the former depicts an astronaut
on a dry, barren moonscape reached as a result of sophisticated western technology,
and the latter an image of a lush tropical paradise, untouched by human hand.
Although Vater offers no specific explanation or critique, these works offer quiet,
oblique reflections on world events and the distribution of power. | | The
garden
|
| Vater's
latest series of works explore different possible scenarios of what might happen
at the end of the world. They are funny, wry, gentle and crazy - much more Hitchhikers
Guide to the Galaxy than the riders of the apocalypse. Like all his works,
this series requires the viewer to step into his imaginative universe, and to
yield to his tactics of charm and persuasion. Vater asks his viewers to let themselves
be entertained, and in this way his subtle and intelligent magic begins to work.
While Vater may not have set out to Florence to become an actor, as Kippenberger
did, he remains the key protagonist in his work; each project is animated by his
uniquely curious and inventive mind, as well as his conjuror's bag of tricks.
| |  |